VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Tvl. Devi Traders v. The Deputy Commissioner (St) Appeal)

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 April 2023
Bench
P.T. Ashaauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 9494/2023

Judgment

ORDER It is informed by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents that the impugned order has been given effect and revenue recovery proceedings have been initiated and properties have also been attached. Therefore, nothing survives for further consideration in the above writ petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to question the revenue recovery proceedings. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

24.04.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes To

1.The Deputy Commissioner (ST)(Appeal), Tirunelveli, Commercial Taxes Buildings, Re-serve Line, High Ground Road, Palayamkottai.

2.The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Ettayapuram.

P.T.ASHA, J. cp Dated: 24.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA and W.M.P(MD) No.8466 of 2023 Tvl.Devi Traders Rep. by its Proprietor Mr.M.Sivakumar No.16, Madurai Road, Vilathikulam Tuticorin District. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Deputy Commissioner (ST)(Appeal), Tirunelveli, Commercial Taxes Buildings, Re-serve Line, High Ground Road, Palayamkottai. 2.The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Ettayapuram. ... Respondents Prayer :- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records pertaining to the impugned proceedings passed by the second respondent in TIN:33255882293/2013-14, dated 25.05.2015 and quash the same as the same is passed without conducting any enquiry with the other end dealers and thus the order was passed by grossly violating the Principles of Natural Justice and to redo the assessment after providing an opportunity of personal hearing. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Satheesh Murugan For Respondents : Mr.T.Amjadkhan Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.