- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 April 2026
- Bench
- P.Dhanabal
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 6467/2026
Judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 06.04.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL
1.Vignesh @ Vigneshwaran
2.S.Rajasekaran ...Petitioners/A2 & A3 Vs
1.State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Villur Police Station, Kalliguid,Madurai District. (Crime No.28 of 2026) ... Respondent
For Petitioners :Mr.A.Arun Ramnath Advocate. For Respondent :Mr.P.Kottai Chamy Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.28 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :-
The petitioners/A2 & A3, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023, and Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.28 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
¶2The case of the prosecution is that on
19.03.2026, at about 15.00 hours, the defacto complainant/Village Administrative Officer, had received a secret information and based on that, the defacto complainant along with police official went to the occurrence place and they found that the petitioners and other accused persons illegally transported half unit of gravel sand by using Tractor bearing Registration No.TN 67 BF 1378. Hence, the case.
¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they were falsely implicated in this case and they are no way connected in the above said incident. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police would submit that the petitioner and other accused persons illegally transported half unit of gravel sand without any permission. He would further submit that the petitioners have no previous cases. However, he opposes to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
¶5Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
¶6Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioner and the quantity of the materials involved in this case, and also considering the fact that the petitioners have no previous cases and A1 arrested and still in custody, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on anticipatory bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Peraiyur, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police once in a week ie., on Every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. [c] the petitioners shall not commit any offences of similar nature. [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions,
the
learned
Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR CRLeOP(MD).eNo.e6467eofe2026 SCWe5560]. [g] e If e the e accused/petitionerse thereaftereabsconds,eaefresheFIRecanebee registeredeundereSectione269eB.N.S. eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee e (PeDeBeJ) eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee e
06.04.2026 vsg eeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee To
1.The learned Judicial Magistrate, Peraiyur.
2.The Inspector of Police, Villur Police Station, Kalliguid,Madurai District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
CRLeOP(MD).eNo.e6467eofe2026 eeP.eDHANABAL,eJ., eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeevsg eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeORDER eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeIN eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeCRLeOP(MD)eNo.e6467eofe2026 eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeDateee:e06.04.2026
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.