- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 April 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 9468/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
¶2The prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous in view of passing of the suspension order on 18.04.2023. It is open to the writ petitioner to question the suspension order.
¶3Granting liberty to the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
21.04.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
21.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN P.Marimuthu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., (TASMAC), Rep. By its Managing Director, CMDA Tower-II, IV Floor, Gandhi Irwin Bridge Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. 2.The Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., (TASMAC) Plot No.100, Anna Nagar, Madurai-625 020. 3.The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation L td., (TASMAC) Narikuravar Colony, Thondi Road, Palamalai Nagar, Soorakulam Village, Sivagangai-630 606. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the third respondent to permit the petitioner herein to work as Salesman in TASMAC Shop No.7518 at Karaikudi, Sivagangai District with continuity of monetary and service benefits within the time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kishore Kumar For Respondents : Mr.H.Arumugam Standing Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.