- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 8 April 2026
- Bench
- Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 9496/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
Judgment
O R D E R Mr.B.Ramanathan, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents.
¶2With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.
¶3Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
¶4The short grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that the disciplinary proceedings, that were initiated against him by issuing a charge memo vide proceedings bearing Na.Ka.No.13624/2016-4/A3, dated
18.02.2021, have not been concluded as on date in spite of conclusion of the enquiry proceedings and submission of the report of the Enquiry Officer. The matter is pending before the first respondent for no reason. Because of the pendency of the disciplinary proceedings, the terminal benefits of the petitioner are not being disbursed in spite of the fact that he has retired from service as early as on 31.05.2023. Hence, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing this writ petition seeking appropriate direction to the respondents to conclude the disciplinary proceedings.
¶5Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submitted that the first respondent would pass appropriate orders and conclude the disciplinary proceedings within a period of eight weeks.
¶6In the light of the above, this writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to conclude the disciplinary proceedings by passing final orders as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In case if the disciplinary proceedings are not concluded within the stipulated period, all the terminal benefits, that are due and payable to the petitioner, shall be released without any further delay with interest as per the rules. No costs.
08.04.2026 NCC : Index : Internet :
krk To:
1.The Additional Chief Secretary, Tourism Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.
2.The Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34. MUMMINENI-SUDHEER-KUMAR,-J. krk W.P.(MD)-No.9496-of-2026
08.04.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.04.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR R.Karunakaran ... Petitioner -vs- 1.Additional Chief Secretary Tourism Culture and Religious Endowments Department Secretariat, Chennai-600 009 2.The Commissioner HR & CE Department Nungambakkam, Chennai-34 ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to conclude the disciplinary proceedings pending against the petitioner in Charge Memo dated 18.02.2021 in Na.Ka.No.13624/2016-4/A3 pursuant to the enquiry report filed by the Inquiry Officer / Joint Commissioner and consequently disburse all the terminal benefits with accrued interest till date in the light of petitioner's representations dated 17.03.2025 and 11.09.2025 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Guruprasath For Respondents : Mr.B.Ramanathan Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.