- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 24 April 2023
- Bench
- C. Saravanan
- Case no.
- CRP(MD) 1127/2022
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioners and the respondent submits that the inter se dispute has been compromised between the parties, which has also been recorded by the Division Bench of this Court in C.M.A(MD)Nos.71 and 72 of 2022, vide order dated 11.04.2023.
¶2In view of the above, nothing further survives for adjudication. Therefore, the present Civil Revision Petition stands closed.
24.04.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No sn To
1.The learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Thoothukudi
2.The Section Officer Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. C.SARAVANAN
,J.
SN
24.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.04.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN 1.Raviprakash 2.Rajasekar 3.Jeya 4.Ponnalagan ...Petitioners/Respondents Vs. Sangeetha ... Respondent/Petitioner PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to call for the records relating to the case in D.V.No.25 of 2022 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Thoothukudi and to strike down the same. For Petitioners : Mr.T.A.Ebenzeer For Respondent : Mr.R.Pon Karthikeyan
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.