- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 3 October 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 10770/2022
Judgment
ORDER Heard both sides.
¶2Based on the audit slip dated 23.12.2021, a sum of Rs.7,11,439/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Eleven Thousand Four Hundred and Thiry Nine only) was included in the CC bill and the impugned communication dated 29.01.2022 came to be issued. It is beyond dispute that before doing so, the respondents have not put the petitioner on notice. When the writ petition was listed for admission, the following interim order came to be passed: "The present writ petition has been filed alleging a demand arising out of the short levy, dated 29.01.2022.
¶2Aggrieved over the said demand, the writ petitioner has given a detailed representation on 02.03.2022. The said representation has not been considered and no final orders have been passed by the respondent authorities. However, the said short levy amount has been included in Serial No.20 of the impugned order, which is the current consumption charges for the month of April 2022. As per the impugned order, dated
10.05.2022, unless the short levy amount demanded on
29.01.2022 is paid along with C.C. bill, his service connection will be disconnected.
¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner point out the Circular issued by the TANGEDCO, dated
03.02.2016, to the effect that in all cases of demand for short levy, the representation made by the consumer should be considered and final order should be passed in a speaking manner duly addressing the contentions of the consumer in the reply to the show cause notice.
¶4In the present case, admittedly the impugned order dated 29.01.2022 should never be construed as an order or demand, but it would only be construed as a show cause notice, for which a reply has been given by the writ petitioner on 02.03.2022.
¶5In view of the above said discussion, the impugned order dated 29.01.2022, shall remain stayed. As far as the impugned order dated 10.05.2022 is concerned, there shall be an order of interim stay with regard to Rs.7,11,439/- alone. The petitioner has to pay the rest of the amount under the impugned order dated 10.05.2022.
¶6Notice returnable by 20.06.2022. Counter by then." Since the petitioner had already offered his representation, the petitioner's rights will be governed by the final order to be passed by the third respondent. The interim order earlier granted is made absolute and it will hold good till final order is passed by the third respondent.
¶3This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
03.10.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To
1.The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002, Represented by its Chairman.
2.The Director Finance, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.
3.The Superintending Engineer,
4.The Accounts Officer / Revenue, The Superintending Engineer Office,
5.The Superintending Engineer, Tirunelveli Electricity Distribution Circle, Tirunelveli.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and W.M.P(MD)No.7770 of 2022
03.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)No.7770 of 2022 Annai Resorts and Spa Private Limited, HTSC No.07909440088, 6-112 B3, Kovalam Road, Opposite to New Bus Stand, Kanyakumari – 629 702, Represented by its Authorized Signatory S.Nallasivan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002, Represented by its Chairman. 2.The Director Finance, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 3.The Superintending Engineer, 4.The Accounts Officer / Revenue, The Superintending Engineer Office, 5.The Superintending Engineer, Tirunelveli Electricity Distribution Circle, Tirunelveli. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the third respondents Impugned Notice bearing Lr. No.SE/KKEDC/NGL/DFC/AO/Rev./RCS/AS/D.858 2021 dated 29.01.2022 (Signed on 05.02.2022 and received by the Petitioner on 21.02.2022 only) and consequential impugned CC bill dated 10.05.2022 under serial no.20 'Adjustment Charges (Not Affecting)' to a tune of Rs.7,11,439/- alone is concerned and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, against principals of natural justice, contrary to the second respondent's own Circular Memo dated 03.02.2016 and against the fifth respondents own monthly allotment letters for the period 06/2016, 07/2016 and 08/2018 respectively and against the provisions of Electricity Act, 2003. For Petitioner : Mr.S.P.Parthasarathy For Respondents : Mr.S.Dheenadhayalan Standing Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.