- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 7 June 2023
- Bench
- S Justice R. Tharani
- Case no.
- REV.APLC(MD) 36/2023
Judgment
ORDER This Review Application is filed against the judgment passed in C.M.A.(MD)No.367 of 2021, dated 19.09.2022.
¶2On the side of the review petitioner, it is stated that the claim petition was filed under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act and the liability of the Insurance Company was restricted only to Rs.5,00,000/-, but, the award was passed for a sum of Rs.7,50,400/-and the award to be restricted to Rs.5,00,000/-
¶3On the side of the respondents/ claimants, it is admitted that the petition was filed only under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act and the counsel for the claimants agreed to reduce the compensation to Rs.5,00,000/-.
¶4Records perused. The counsel for the Insurance Company failed to mention that this petition was filed under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, at the time of his arguments.
¶5Since the counsel for the claimants agreed to reduce the award amount, the following rectification are made in the judgement:
¶6In paragraph No.9, the following words are to be inserted "Since the petition was filed under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, the award is restricted to Rs.5,00,000/-.
7.1. In paragraph No.9(i) the number Rs.7,50,400/- is to be removed and replaced as Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only)"
7.2. In paragraph No.9 (ii), in the second line, the number Rs. 7,50,400/- is to be removed and replaced as Rs.5,00,000/-.
7.3. In paragraph No.9 (iv), in the third line, the number Rs. 3,50,400/- (Rupees Three Laksh Fifty Thousand and Four Hundred only) is to be removed and replaced as Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only).
7.4. In paragraph No.9 (iv), in the fifth line, the number Rs.4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs only) is to be removed and replaced as Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs only).
¶8With the above observations, this Review Application is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. And the Registry is directed to modify the above order in paragraph Nos.9, 9(i), 9(ii) and 9(iv) and to issue a fresh order copy and the decree.
07.06.2023 NCC: Yes / No Index: Yes / No Ls To
1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum Principal District Judge, Dindigul.
2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
R.THARANI, J. Ls Rev.Aplc(MD)No.36 of 2023
07.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 07.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI Rev.Aplc(MD)No. 36 of 2023 and C.M.P.(MD)No.5491 of 2023 The Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd., Office at Sub Collector office Road, Opposite to District Court, Dindigul. ... Petitioner /2nd Respondent Vs. 1.Rasu 2.Murugammal ... Respondents 1 & 2 /Appellants 1 & 2 3.Ponnusamy ... 3rd Respondent / 1st Respondent PRAYER :- Review Application is filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 r/w Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to review the judgment and decree, dated 19.09.2022, in C.M.A.(MD)No.367 of 2021 passed by this Court. For Review Petitioner : Mr.A.S.Mathialgan For Respondents : Mr. S.Pugalendhi for R1 and R2 : No appearance for R3
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.