Kalyanasundram.K v. The Commissioner

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] The apprehension of the petitioner is that if the offending construction is allowed, the same would affect the quality of the water in the Well, which is situated within his property.

¶2Mr.Veera Kathiravan, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for the respondents by producing a photograph, would make a statement that the proposed public toilet, which is under construction, is to be connected to the underground drainage, which is available in the area and therefore, the apprehension of the petitioner has no basis.

¶3In view of the above submission and the fact that the public toilet is constructed in the road margin of a very wide road, we do not think that the petitioner has a cause to complain. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

[R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.]

24.04.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :

krk R.SUBRAMANIAN

, J.

and L.VICTORIA GOWRI

, J.

krk

24.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and W.M.P.(MD) No.8531 of 2023 K.Kalyanasundaram ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Commissioner Tuticorin Corporation Tuticorin 2.The Assistant Commissioner West Zone, Tuticorin Corporation Tuticorin ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to remove the construction made in T.S.No.3459/2, Ward No.4, Block No.21A, V.V.D.Road, West Zone, Tuticorin City. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kumar For Respondents : Mr.Veera Kathiravan Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.N.Anandakumar