S.Ramesh v. The Tahsildhar,

ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the matter has become infructuous, since patta has now been granted to the petitioner and therefore, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. W.P.(MD) No.11028 of 2020

¶2In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) // True Copy // /07/2023 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) abr To

1.The Tahsildar, Manmangalam Taluk, Karur District.

2.The Head Surveyor, Manmangalam Firka, Karur District. W.P.(MD) No.11028 of 2020 Dated: 16.06.2023

MK/08.07.2023 2P 3C

W.P.(MD) No.11028 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA W.P.(MD) No.11028 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD) No.9670 of 2020 S.Ramesh .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Manmangalam Taluk, Karur District. 2.The Head Surveyor, Manmangalam Firka, Karur District. .. Respondents Prayer :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertains to impugned order of the first respondent in proceedings in File No.2019/0105/14/030034 dated 24.08.2020 and quash the same as illegal and unconstitutional, consequently direct the respondents to carry out survey and demarcate the petitioner's property comprised in S.Nos.917/2A and 917/2C, admeasuring of 2.40 Acres of punja land, situated in Panchamadevi Village, Manmangalam Taluk, Karur District and issue patta on the name of petitioner thereon, within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Saravanan For Respondents : Mr.D.Ghandiraj Special Government Pleader