VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

D. Jeyaganesh, v. Latha,

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
1 July 2026
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
CRL RC(MD) 1060/2026

Judgment

ORDER Seeking to set aside the order passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar District Srivilliputtur in Crl.M.P.No.2828 of 2025, dated 05.12.2025 in Unnumbered C.A. Of 2025, this criminal revision case is filed.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the appellant in an unnumbered criminal appeal who had filed Crl.M.P.No.2828 of 2025 under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 12 days in filing appeal against the judgement passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court, Sriviliputtur, in S.T.C.No.42 of 2023 dated 04.07.2025. The petitioner is the accused before the learned trial Court. The petitioner was convicted after full-fledged trial in S.T.C.No.42 of 2023 by the Learned Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court, Sriviliputtur sentencing him to one year imprisonment and compensation of Rs.2,00,000/-. Against which, the petitioner had filed Crl.M.P.No.2828 of 2025 to condone a delay of 12 days in preferring a criminal appeal. The same was ordered on cost of Rs. 1000/- to be paid by the petitioner on or before 04.12.2025. However, due to the inadvertence of the trial Court counsel and non-communication of the same to the petitioner, the same was not paid within 04.12.2025. Pursuant to which, the order passed by the Learned Session's judge stood vacated on 05.12.2025. Challenging the vacating order, this criminal revision case is filed.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for the mistake of the counsel, the litigant should not be allowed to suffer and sought the indulgence of this Court to permit the petitioner to pay the cost by extending the time for paying the same.

¶4Considering the limited relief sought for, the petitioner is directed to pay a cost of Rs.5,000/- before the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputtur on or before

15.07.2026. On such payment, the delay of 12 days in filing the appeal against the judgement passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court, Srivilliputhur in S.T.C.No.42 of 2023 dated 04.07.2025 would be condoned. The Learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputtur is directed to number the criminal appeal.

¶5With the above directions, this Criminal Revision Case is allowed.

01.07.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No gbg Note : Issue order copy on 02.07.2026. To

1.The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputtur.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. L.VICTORIA GOWRI ,J. gbg Dated: 01.07.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI D.Jeyaganesh ... Petitioner/Petitioner/ Appellant/Accused Vs. Latha ... Respondent/Respondent/ Respondent/Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 438 r/w 442 B.N.S.S., to call for the records relating to the order dated 05.12.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2828 of 2025 in Unnumbered C.A. of 2025 on the file of the Learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar District Srivilliputtur and set aside the same, and consequently direct the learned lower appellate Court to restore the said petition and permit the petitioner to comply with the condition of payment of cost as directed by the lower appellate Court within such time as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Balaji For Respondent : No Appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.