- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 June 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 871/2023
Judgment
O R D E R
This contempt petition is filed that the order of this Court in in WP(MD) No.5018 of 2020, dated 07.01.2022 has not been complied with.
2.Today(13.06.2023), when this Contempt Petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submits that the request of the petitioner was rejected by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.634/A1/2022, dated
31.05.2023.
3.Recording the aforesaid submission, this contempt petition is closed with a liberty to the petitioner to challenge the above order in the manner known to law.
13.06.2023
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No vrn To The Chief Educational Officer, Office of the Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli District. CONT.P.(MD)No.871 of 2023 B.PUGALENDHI,oJ. vrn Orderomadeoin CONT.P.(MD)No.871oofo2023 in W.P(MD)oNo.5018oofo2020
13.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI in W.P(MD) No.5018 of 2020 G.Manuel Ayyadurai ...Petitioner/Petitioner .vs. 1.V.Thirupathy Chief Educational Officer, Office of the Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli District. 2.R.V.Ramavathy ...Contemnors/Respondents PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to issue summons to the respondents herein and deal with them in accordance with law for their willful disobedience of the order dated 07.01.2022 in WP(MD) No.5018 of 2020. For Petitioner :Mr.C.Vakeeswaran For Respondents :Mr.J.K.Jayseelan Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.