- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 26 April 2023
- Bench
- C.V. Karthikeyan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 9998/2023
Judgment
O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of a Mandamus, seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 14.12.2020.
¶2In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, it had been stated that the land in R.S.No.424/5 situated in Vilpatty Village, Kodaikkanal Circle, Dindigul District, originally belonged to the grand father of the petitioner and thereafter, the Government had also issued a Dhargasthu Patta vide D.K.T.No.619/82 along with power of alienation. The petitioner claims to be in possession. He filed an application seeking issuance of computerized chitta.
¶3Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3.
¶4A direction is given to the second respondent to examine the revenue records relating to the said land. It may be examined whether the land vests with the Government or with the petitioner and thereafter, the second respondent may issue notice to the petitioner herein and take a decision whether to grant of computerized chitta. If a decision is taken not to grant computerized chitta, necessary reasons must be given. The entire exercise must be completed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶5Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
26.04.2023 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No ssb To
1.The District Collector, Dindigul District.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.
3.The Tahsildar, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.
C.V. KARTHIKEYAN, J. ssb
26.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN P.Daniel Jeyaraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District. 3.The Tahsildar, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District. ...Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner representation dated 14.12.2020 and pass suitable orders for mutation on revenue records in the petitioner name and issue computer chitta to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vinod Sathya Lazar For Respondents : M/s.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.