VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Philipmary v. Employees Provident Fund Organisation

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 June 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 9981/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The petitioner seeks payment of widow pension. She had submitted a representation dated 03.04.2023. The second respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's request in the light of all the relevant records and pass order within a period of five weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶3This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

30.06.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry, Rayapettah High Road, Chennai – 600 014.

2.The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Pension), Sub-Regional Office, Lady Dock College Road, Chokkikulam, Madurai – 625 002.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

30.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Philipmary ... Petitioner Vs 1.Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Represented by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry, Rayapettah High Road, Chennai – 600 014. 2.The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Pension), Sub-Regional Office, Lady Dock College Road, Chokkikulam, Madurai – 625 002. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to pay her husband's pension amount to the petitioner under Employees Pension Scheme from the date the petitioner became eligible for monthly pension with arrears and future pension on the basis of the petitioner's representation, dated 03.04.2023 and in the light of the her husband provisional pension payment order issued by the second respondent in P.P.O.No.TN/MDU/MMP/13168/97 within the time stipulated. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Shakul Hameed For Respondents : Mr.P.Karthick Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.