Loganathan.C v. The Management of

O R D E R The writ petitioner was employed in the respondent corporation. He retired from service on 30.04.2014. Since his dues were not settled, he filed W.P.(MD)No.8044 of 2017. This Court vide order dated

27.04.2017 disposed of the said writ petition with certain terms. The grievance of the petitioner is that the time limit stipulated by this Court was not adhered to. There was delay in settling the amounts. If that be so, the petitioner will be entitled to interest in terms of the order dated

27.04.2017 made in W.P.(MD)No.8044 of 2017. This interest amount payable to the petitioner shall be settled within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

2.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

26.04.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ias G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. ias

26.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN C.Loganathan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Management of State Express Transport Corporation (Tamilnadu) Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 2. 2.The Branch Manager, State Express Transport Corporation (Tamilnadu) Ltd., Madurai. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to pay interest for the belated payment of Gratuity from 01.06.2014 as per petitioner's calculation. For Petitioner : Mr.K.K.Samy For Respondents : Mr.K.Senthilkumar, Standing Counsel.