Jesu.A v. The Director General of Police

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The petitioner had filed this writ petition questioning the impugned order dated 30.06.2022 passed by the second respondent. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has also filed revision before the first respondent. Instead of testing the correctness of the impugned order, I direct the first respondent to pass order on the petitioner's revision petition dated 01.09.2022 on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter.

¶3This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

30.06.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai – 4.

2.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Madurai Range, Madurai.

3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Ramanathapuram Range, Ramanathapuram.

4.The Additional Superintendent of Police, Crime against Women & Children (CWC), Ramanathapuram.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

30.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN A.Jesu ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai – 4. 2.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Madurai Range, Madurai. 3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Ramanathapuram Range, Ramanathapuram. 4.The Additional Superintendent of Police, Crime against Women & Children (CWC), Ramanathapuram. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records passed by the second respondent in proceedings Na.Ka.No.A2(1)/2176187/58/2022 dated 30.06.2022 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Robinson For Respondents : Mr.T.Villavan Kothai Additional Government Pleader