VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Nagaraj.S v. The Managing Director

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
26 April 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 10071/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The petitioner was working as conductor in TNSTC, Kumbakonam Limited, Karaikudi Division. He came to TNSTC, Madurai Division by mutual transfer arrangement. Now, the petitioner wants to go to Theni. The petitioner questions the work allotment order issued by the third respondent.

¶3I fail to understand as to how the work allotment order can be questioned when the petitioner is working under the third respondent. The petitioner does not have any legal right as such to insist that he should be posted at Theni. These are matters which are left entirely to the discretion of the Management. The Writ Court will not be justified in giving any specific direction. It is for the employer to consider the petitioner's request.

¶4The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

26.04.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

26.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.8841 of 2023 S.Nagaraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Managing Director, TNSTC (Kumbakonam) Ltd., No.27, Railway Station New Road, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District-612 001. 2.The Managing Director, TNSTC (Madurai) Ltd., Bye-pass Road, Madurai-625 010. 3.The Assistant Manager (Admin), Administration Department, TNSTC (Madurai) Ltd., Madurai Region. 4.The Branch Manager, Pudur Branch, TNSTC (Madurai) Ltd., Madurai. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned Work Allotment Order issued by the third respondent through his proceeding in epU m3/17586:22 dated 24.03.2023 and to quash the same and consequently, direct the third respondent to pass Fresh Work Allotment Order appointing the petitioner in any one of the places in Theni District. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Balamurugan For Respondents : Mr.K.Jagadeesbalan Standing Counsel for R1 : Mr.Gladson Micheal Rajadurai Standing Counsel for R2 to R4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.