Thangapandi v. Ravi

JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.) It is stated that the encroachment made by the petitioner has been removed. It is the complaint of the learned counsel for the petitioner that in the guise of removing encroachment, the respondent has also demolished a portion of the petitioner's property. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent would contend that that was also an encroachment. We are not going into all those questions in this contempt proceedings. Since there is substantial compliance of the order passed, the contempt petition is closed leaving it open to the petitioner to agitate all other questions in appropriate proceedings. (R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.) & (L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.)

06.06.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes bala To Ravi, The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. Cont.P(MD)No.924eofe2023

R.SUBRAMANIAN , J. and

L.VICTORIA GOWRI , J. balagg DATED : 06.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.06.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Thangapandi ... Petitioner vs. Ravi, The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondent PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to initiate contempt proceedings against the contemnor / 3rd respondent and punish him for the willful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P(MD)No.24723 of 2022 dated 31-10-2022. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Chakravarthy For Respondent : Mr.P.Thilakkumar, Government Pleader