Natesan v. The District Collector

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] Mr.P.Thilakkumar, learned Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents.

¶2With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is taken up for final hearing at the admission stage itself.

¶3The cutting order has been issued to the original successful bidder on 24.03.2023. There can be no public auction now. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed. The respondents shall ensure that the person who has been favoured with the cutting order is given adequate protection to take the fruits of the investment. No costs.

[R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.]

27.04.2023 NCC : No Index : No Internet : Yes

PKN To:

¶1The District Collector, Collectorate, Ramanathapuram District.

¶2The Tahsildar, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

¶3The Block Development Officer, Nayinar Kovil Block, Ramanathapuram District. oR.SUBRAMANIANoo,oJo. AND oL.VICTORIAoGOWRIoo,oJo. PKN W.P.(MD)oNo.9912oofo2023

27.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Natesan ... Petitioner -vs- 1. The District Collector, Collectorate, Ramanathapuram District. 2. The Tahsildar, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 3. The Block Development Officer, Nayinar Kovil Block, Ramanathapuram District. 4. Sundarrajan ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take a necessary action for conducting a public auction regarding a cutting of Karuvelam Trees in Madathu Oorani situated at Radhapulli Revenue Village, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 05.04.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Ezhilarasu For Respondents : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar Government Pleader