Maniraj.P v. The Registrar

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.04.2023 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.T.RAJA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN P.Maniraj ... Petitioner in both W.Ps. -vs-

1.The Registrar Debt Recovery Tribunal Madurai

2.The Authorized Officer Indian Bank No.92N, Devarpuram Road Melur Branch Thoothukudi ... Respondents 1 & 2 in both W.Ps. rd3.S.Murugananth ... 3 Respondent in W.P.(MD) No.10079 of 2023 rd4.R.Rajan ... 3 Respondent in W.P.(MD) No.10080 of 2023 PRAYER (in W.P.(MD) No.10079 of 2023): Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to main number the application preferred by the petitioner provisionally numbered as e-DRT Diary Number 411 of 2023, filed to set aside the sale certificate dated 01.06.2022 and the consequent registration made by the second respondent bank in favour of the third respondent in respect of the property in UDR S.No.648B/2A1 situated in Keezhavallanadu Village, Thoothukudi District, measuring to an extent of 1 Acre 70 Cents and decide the same on merits within a time stipulated by this Court. PRAYER (in W.P.(MD) No.10080 of 2023): Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to main number the application preferred by the petitioner provisionally numbered as e-DRT Diary Number 410 of 2023, filed to set aside the sale certificate dated 18.04.2022 and the consequent registration made by the second respondent bank in favour of the third respondent in respect of the property in Old S.No.6/6 and New S.No.6/6B, Mappillaiyoorani Village, Thoothukudi District, measuring to an extent of 54 Cents and decide the same on merits within a time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Kathirvelu, Senior Counsel (in both W.Ps) assisted by Mr.K.Jeyamohan For Respondents : Mr.Jayesh B.Dolia, Senior Counsel, for R2 (in both W.Ps) C O M M O N O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE] When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he is withdrawing these writ petitions and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement so made, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

[T.R., A.C.J.] [R.S.M., J.]

26.04.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :

krk T.RAJA, A.C.J. and R.SUBRAMANIAN , J . krk

26.04.2023