- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 23 June 2023
- Bench
- C.V. Karthikeyan
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 937/2023
Judgment
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the issue raised in the contempt petition had been addressed by the respondent.
¶2In view of the said representation, the contempt petition stands closed. No costs.
23.06.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No pnn To
1.The District Registrar, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. pnn ORDER IN
23.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN P.Senthamil Selvan ... Petitioner Vs. C.Sasikala The District Registrar, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. ... Respondent PRAYER :- Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying this Court to punish the respondent herein for the willful disobedience of the order passed by this Hon`ble Court made in W.P.(MD).No.24630 of 2022 dated 31-10-2022 under the contempt of courts act. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.