VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S. Sigamani v. The Managing Director

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
26 April 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 9980/2023

Judgment

O R D E R Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The petitioner is working as Driver in the respondent corporation. The bus driven by him was involved in a fatal accident. The petitioner was departmentally dealt with and punishment was imposed on him by the second respondent. The petitioner claims to have obtained honourable acquittal in the criminal prosecution. In the light of the said development, the petitioner wants the punishment to be reconsidered and reviewed. The petitioner has given a representation before the first respondent. The first respondent is directed to dispose of the same and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

3.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

26.04.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ias G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J. ias

26.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.Sigamani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District. 2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Pudukkottai Region, Pudukkottai. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to reconsider the punishment of stoppage increment for 2 years with cumulative effect imposed on the petitioner vide order passed by the 1st respondent dated 12.05.2014 based on the judgment passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Pattukkotai in STC.No.526 of 2011 dated 12.09.2013 and consequently directing the respondents to pass orders re-fixing the petitioner's pay and terminal benefits and further to pay the difference amount in wages and difference amount in terminal benefits within a time based on the petitioners representation dated 19.02.2020. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Anbarasu For Respondents : Mr.K.Jagadeesbalan, Standing Counsel.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.