VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Jeyachandran L v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
25 April 2023
Bench
The Acting Chief Justice, R. Subramanian
Case no.
WP(MD) 9905/2023

Judgment

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE] Mr.S.P.Maharajan, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents 1 to 5.

¶2Considering the nature of the relief, notice to the private respondent is dispensed with.

¶3With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is taken up for final hearing at the admission stage itself.

¶4L.Jeyachandran, son of Lakshmanan, has filed this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 5 to remove the encroachment made by the sixth respondent in the common pathway in Survey No.50/3B of Parivillikottai Village, Ottapidaram Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

¶5In support of the prayer sought for, the petitioner has also produced a notice, dated 28.10.2023, appears to have been issued under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (for brevity, "the Act"), by the Tahsildar, Ottapidaram Taluk, which shows that the land in Survey No.50/3B of Parivillikottai Village, to an extent of Hectare 0.01.0 Ares, is classified as "epytpay; ghij" and the nature of encroachment is Garden.

¶6Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that though the said notice was issued to the sixth respondent as early as on

28.10.2022, no action was taken till date by the Tahsildar to remove the encroachment. Therefore, the petitioner has come up with this writ petition.

¶7Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 5 submitted that there is no notice issued under Section 7 of the Act, however, since the Thasildar has issued the notice dated 28.10.2022, he has to proceed further for removal of encroachment.

¶8We also find that the sixth respondent prima facie appears to have encroached the land in question, which is classified as "epytpay; ghij" as Garden. Therefore, the fourth respondent is hereby directed to remove the encroachment made by the sixth respondent, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving due notice to all the parties concerned and by following due process of law.

¶9The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs.

[T.R., A.C.J.] [R.S.M., J.]

25.04.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :

krk To:

1.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Thoothukudi District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ottapidaram, Thoothukudi District.

4.The Tashildhar, Ottapidaram Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

5.The Block Development Officer, Ottapidaram, Thoothukudi District. T.RAJA, A.C.J. and R.SUBRAMANIAN , J . krk

25.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.04.2023 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.T.RAJA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN L.Jeyachandran ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The District Collector Thoothukudi District Thoothukudi 2.The District Revenue Officer Thoothukudi District 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Ottapidaram Thoothukudi District 4.The Tashildhar Ottapidaram Taluk Thoothukudi District 5.The Block Development Officer Ottapidaram Thoothukudi District 6.Chandrasekaran ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 to remove the encroachments made by the sixth respondent in the common pathway situated in Survey No.50/3B, Parivillikottai, Ottapidaram Taluk, Thoothukudi District, in accordance with the eviction notice issued by the fourth resondent in Na.Ka.No.A3/09/2022, dated 28.10.2022, within a time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Dinesh For Respondents : Mr.S.P.Maharajan Special Government Pleader for R1 to R5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.