A.Muneshwaran Rathinam, v. The Senior Regional Manager

O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments happened after filing of this Writ Petition, no further adjudication is required in this Writ Petition and requested to pass an appropriate order.

¶2In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, in my considered view, nothing survives in this Writ Petition and it has to be dismissed as infructuous.

¶3Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶4No costs.

¶5Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

08.08.2023 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No CM To,

1.The Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC) Madurai.

¶2The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC) SIPCOT, Thoothukudi.

BATTU DEVANAND, J. CM W.P.(MD)No.1113 of 2019 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.937& 938 of 2019

08.08.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W.P.(MD)No.1113 of 2019 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.937 & 938 of 2019 A. Muneshwaran Rathinam ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC) Madurai. 2. The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC) SIPCOT, Thoothukudi. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent to permit the petitioner to attend and to do his work as salesman in any of the retail liquor vending shops run by the Respondent Corporation and to pay the Petitioner his salary or in the alternative subsistence allowance for his employment as Salesman of Retail Liquor vending shop run by the Respondent Corporation. For Petitioner : Mr.G. Prabhu Rajadurai For Respondents : Mr.B. Jameel Arasu Special Government Advocate