- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 15 September 2023
- Bench
- D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 1124/2019
Judgment
O R D E R *********
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 submitted that the prayer in the Writ Petition has since become infructuous.
2.In such view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
15.09.2023
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No NCC:Yes/No vsn To
1.The Secretary to Government, Education Department, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, St.Fort George, Chennai -9.
2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai-6.
3.The Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli.
4.The District Educational Officer, Tirunelveli. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY,J. vsn 0RDER MADE IN W.P(MD)NO.1124 of 2019 and W.M.P(MD)No.946 of 2019
15.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:15.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P(MD)NO.1124 of 2019 and W.M.P(MD)No.946 of 2019 Snow Stalin Vino :Petitioner .vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, Education Department, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, St.Fort George, Chennai -9. 2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai-6. 3.The Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli. 4.The District Educational Officer, Tirunelveli. 5.The Correspondent, St.Xavier's Higher Secondary School, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli-2. : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the order passed by the fourth respondent in his proceedings in O.Mu.No.4497/A2/2018, dated 2.11.2018 and to quash the same and consequently to direct the respondents to approve the appointment of the Petitioner as Library Attendar in the fifth respondent school from the date of his appointment on 6.8.2018 and to disburse the service and monetary benefits along with arrears within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner :Mr.T.A.Ebenezer For Respondents :Mr.J.John Rajadurai 1 to 4 Govt.Advocate For Respondent-5 :No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.