VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

G.Subramanian v. The Manager

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 March 2023
Bench
R. Subramanianauthor, S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
Case no.
WP(MD) 11501/2019

Judgment

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] Learned counsel for the petitioner has made the following endorsement: "The petitioner permitted to withdraw this writ petition."

¶2Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

[R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.]

17.03.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :

krk To: The Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Sivagangai District. R.SUBRAMANIAN , J . and L.VICTORIA GOWRI , J . krk

17.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI G.Subramanian ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Manager Sivagangai Devasthanam Old Block Complex Sivagangai, Sivagangai District 2.The Assistant Commissioner HR & CE Department Sivagangai District 3.The Superintending Engineer TNEB, Sivagangai Sivagangai District 4.The Assistant General TNEB, West Thiruppuvanam Sivagangai, Sivagangai District 5.The Assistant Director of Municipality Sivagangai Region Collectorate Complex Sivagangai District 6.The Executive Officer Tiruppuvanam Selection Grade Panchayat Tiruppuvanam, Sivagangai District 7.Selvam ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 2 to 6 to take appropriate action as against the tenants who are all not paying the monthly rent regularly and further to direct the first respondent to take appropriate action against the seventh respondent and to demolish the puckka brick building in the property of the first respondent Devasthanam in vacant site No.72 in Survey No.49/2 of Tiruppuvanam Revenue Village, Tiruppuvanam Taluk, Sivagangai District, which is belongs to the Arulmigu Pushpaneswarar Temple. For Petitioner : Mr.K.C.Ramalingam For Respondents : Mr.S.Madhavan for R1 Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam Government Advocate for R2 Mr.S.Deenadayalan Standing Counsel for R3 & R4 Mr.D.Muruganantham for R6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.