- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 27 April 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 7942/2023
Judgment
O R D E R
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 2nd Respondent not to harass the petitioner for cancel the settlement deed, without following due process of law, based on the petitioner's complaint dated 21.04.2023.
¶2The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the third respondent herein, enquiry was undertaken. During the course of enquiry, it was found that it is a issue between the mother and son. The mother of the petitioner had executed a sale deed in favour of the petitioner excluding the other son. Since it is the civil issue between the members of the same family, the complaint that was given by the third respondent was closed on
06.04.2023.
¶3In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
27.04.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Indu To
1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Alagappapuram Police Station, Sivagangai District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN. J. Indu
27.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Arulsamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Alagappapuram Police Station, Sivagangai District. 3.Anthoniyammal ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the 2nd Respondent not to harass the petitioner for cancel the settlement deed, without following due process of law, based on the petitioner's complaint dated 21.04.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Hariharan For Respondents : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 and R2
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.