Basker v. The District Collector,

ORDER When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

29.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes ssb

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb To

1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Commissioner, Srivilliputhur Municipality, Virudhunagar District. Dated : 29.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.9353 and 9354 of 2019 Basker .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Commissioner, Srivilliputhur Municipality, Virudhunagar District. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the impugned tender notification of the 2nd respondent made in Na.Ka.No. 3192/2018/E1 Sl.No.2, dated 11.09.2018 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jegadeesh Pandian For R1 : Mr.G.Suriyanath Government Advocate For R2 : Mr.P.Parekh Kumar Standing Counsel