- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 19 June 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 10306/2023
Judgment
O R D E R Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner.
¶2The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous.
¶3In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
19.06.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No Ls To
1.The Inspector of police Somarasampettai Police Station, Tiruchirappalli District.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN,J Ls Dated : 19.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.06.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN A.Lakshmanan ... Petitioner Vs. The Inspector of police Somarasampettai Police Station, Tiruchirappalli District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 19.04.2023 and to grant permission to the Organizers of the festival Arulmigu Sri Pannaiyadi Karuppu Samy and Egiripidari Amman Kovil, Adavathur Village, Tiruchirappalli District, on 06.05.2023, for conducting dance and entertainment programs as permissible under law. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.