- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 27 April 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 8028/2023
Judgment
ORDER This Criminal Original Petition had been filed seeking for a direction against the second respondent not to harass the petitioner by insisting the petitioner to execute the sale deed in favour of the third respondent.
2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the third respondent has given a complaint against the petitioner stating that he had received Rs.10 lakhs as advance and agreeing to sell the property and later, he failed to do so. Hence, the complaint was given by the third respondent to recover the said amount. During the course of enquiry, the petitioner and the third respondent appeared before the second respondent and the petitioner had agreed to settle the issue.
3.However, no such letter of undertaking is available with the records. The issue between the parties is in respect of sale of property. Let the above said complaint given by the third respondent be closed by the second respondent, by directing the third respondent to approach the appropriate Civil Court to work out his remedy.
4.With the above observations, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of.
27.04.2023 NCC:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No PNM To
¶1The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.
¶2The Inspector of Police, Panthalgudi Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
G.ILANGOVAN, J. PNM ORDER IN
27.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN M.Dhanapaul @ Dhanapandi ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2. The Sub Inspector of Police, Taluk Police Station, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 3. Raja ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying this Court to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner by insisting the petitioner to execute the sale deed in favour of the third respondent. For Petitioner : Mr. KC.Ramalingam For R1 and R2 : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.