VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

P.Sivaramalingam v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 April 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 10200/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The petitioner was implicated in a vigilance case. He was arrested and he was suspended from service on 31.12.2020. The petitioner has given the petition mentioned representation for review of the suspension order. However, in this writ petition, the suspension order has been put to challenge.

¶3The suspension order cannot be set aside. However, the second respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned representation and take a call.

¶4The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

27.04.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.

2.The Sub Collector, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.

3.The District Revenue Officer, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.

4.The Tahsildar, Watrap Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

5.The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Virudhunagar.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

27.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.8976 of 2023 P.Sivaramalingam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Sub Collector, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District. 3.The District Revenue Officer, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District. 4.The Tahsildar, Watrap Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 5.State through The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Virudhunagar. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to challenge the impugned order passed by the second respondent in ROCA3/8820/2020, dated 31.12.2020 and quash the same as illegal and unconstitutional and consequently, direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner and to regularise the services of the petitioner by taking into the petitioner's representation dated 28.01.2022 and 10.04.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Mariappan For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.