VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Suresh v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 June 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 10923/2022

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the F.I.R in Crime No.177 of 2022, on the file of the first respondent.

¶2Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that after investigation, final report was closed as "mistake of fact" and R.C.S. notice was served upon the petitioners. The report was submitted before the Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam. So the matter has become infructuous.

¶3Since the closure report has been filed before the concerned Court, the petitioners are at liberty to work out remedy through proper proceedings. This Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

22.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Ls To

¶1The Inspector of Police Thattarmadam Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN, J., Ls

22.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.06.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.6891 of 2022 1.Suresh 2.Suba Christy Ponmalar ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The State through its The Inspector of Police Thattarmadam Police Station, Thoothukudi District. Crime No.177 of 2022 2.Jesus Antony Xavier ... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in Crime No.177 of 2022, on the file of the first respondent police and to quash the same as against the petitioners. For Petitioners : Mr.T.A.Ebenezer For R1 : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 : Mr.J.David Ganesan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.