Rathika v. The District Collector

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The petitioner's husband Muthuveeran was working as Office Assistant in the audit section of the District Collector. He was implicated in a criminal case. Crime No.4 of 2018 was registered on the file of City Crime Branch Unit II, Madurai. He was suspended from service. While so, the petitioner's husband passed away on 27.06.2022. Since the delinquent /accused passed away, the proceedings necessarily abate. The petitioner has applied to the respondent for disbursement of the terminal benefits.

¶3When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that the Collector has issued appropriate order for treating disciplinary action initiated against the petitioner as abated. I do not find any impediment for disbursing terminal benefits to the petitioner. The respondent shall disburse them to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible.

¶4The Writ Petition is allowed on these terms. No costs.

07.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

07.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Rathika ... Petitioner Vs. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.11.2022 within a time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Venkata Subramanian For Respondent : Mr.T.Villavan Kothai Additional Government Pleader