VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Thilsath Begum v. The Branch Manager

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
31 August 2023
Bench
The Chief Justice, C.Kumarappan
Case no.
WP(MD) 10547/2023

Judgment

ORDER [Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE] We have heard Mr.R.Murali, for Mr.V.Balai, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the bank.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the only purpose of filing the writ petition is that the respondent bank should provide the policy details. The loan was insured. The policy details had not been provided with.

¶3The learned Standing Counsel for the bank, on instructions, submits that within a period of two weeks from today, the policy details along with documents would be provided to the petitioner.

¶4The statement is accepted.

¶5In view of the said statement, the writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (S.V.G., CJ.) (C.K., J.)

31.08.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index : Yes/No PM W.P(MD)No.10547oofo2023 THEoHON'BLEoCHIEFoJUSTICE ando C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. PM W.P.(MD)No.10547oofo2023

31.08.2023 Pageg4gofg4

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.08.2023 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN and W.M.P(MD)No.9364 of 2023 Thilsath Begum ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, No.494, New Street, Mathurapuri, Thuraiyur – 621 010, Trichy District. 2.The Authorized Officer, (Under the SARFAESI Act, 2002), Indian Overseas Bank, No.494, New Street, Mathurapuri, Thuraiyur -621 010, Trichy District. .. Respondents PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to furnish the copy of the liability insurance scheme in which the borrower late. K.Akbar was a member and the first respondent is the master policy holder of the scheme and consequently, direct the respondents to adjust the outstanding loan amount in Account No.HL-099603351300005 with the claim available under the liability insurance scheme on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 05.04.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murali, for Mr.V.Balai For Respondents : Mr.N.Dilipkumar, Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.