VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S.Jegatheesan v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
11 October 2023
Bench
N. Anand Venkateshauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 11922/2020

Judgment

O R D E R This writ petition has been filed for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 25 not to entertain any application for patta transfer or for mutation of revenue records submitted by the 26th respondent or his family members or anyone claiming under him with respect to the subject properties pending final adjudication of the questions of law and also various legal issues involved in CRP (MD) Nos.1797 to 1799 / 2019.

¶2Heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioner, the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents 1 to 25 and the learned senior counsel for the 26th respondent.

¶3It is not necessary for this Court to go into various issues that have been raised in this writ petition in view of the fact that CRP (MD) Nos.1797 to 1799 / 2019 have been disposed of by an order dated

08.04.2021 and the order passed by this Court has also been further confirmed by the Apex Court while dismissing the SLP filed in SLP Nos. 6985 to 6987 of 2021 dated 02.07.2021.

¶4In view of this development, the prayer sought for in the present writ petition has become infructuous. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that this Court had passed an order in Tr. CRP Nos.301 to 303 /2023 and had directed the Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli to dispose of all the proceedings preferably within a period of 12 months. Hence, substantial issue/dispute between the parties is now pending before the Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli. In any case, it is now too well settled that the writ Court can never be used for the sake of getting an interim order/interim relief when a substantial relief is pending before the competent forum. Therefore, if at all the petitioner wants any interim relief, the petitioner can only approach the competent Court, where the proceedings are pending. Except giving this clarity, no further orders can be passed in this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

11.10.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No RR To

¶1The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶2The District Collecotr, Thoothukudi District Thoothukudi.

¶3The District Collector, Kanyakumari District Nagerkovil.

¶4The Sub-Collector, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District.

¶5The Sub Collector,,

¶6The District Revenue Officer, Tirunelveli.

¶7The District Revenue Officer, Thoothukudi.

¶8The District Revenue Officer, Nagerkoil, Kanyakumari District.

¶9The Revenue Divisional Offic, Er, Tiruchendur, Thoothukudi District.

¶10The Revenue Divisional Offic, Er, Srivaikuntam, Thoothukudi District.

¶11The Revenue Divisional Offic, Er, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District.

¶12The Revenue Divisional Offic, Er, Nagarkoilkanyakumari District.

¶13The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Thisayanvilai, Tirunelveli District.

¶14The Tahsildar, Officethisayanvilai Tirunelveli District.

¶15The Tahsildar,, Office of Tahsildar, Eral, Thoothukudi District.

¶16The Tahsildar,, Office of Tahsildar, Ettayapuram,

¶17The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar Ettayapuram

¶18The Tahsildar,, Office of Tahsildar, Ottapidaram,

¶19The Tahsildar,, Office of Tahsildar, Srivaikuntam,

¶20The Tahsildar,, Office of Tahsildar, Tirchendur,

¶21The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Thoothukudi,

¶22The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar Vilathikulam

¶23The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Kalkulam Kanyakumari District.

¶24The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Kalkulam Kanyakumari District.

¶25The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Killiyur Kanyakumari District.

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. RR W.P.(MD)No.11922

of 2020

11.10.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :11.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and WMP(MD) Nos.11749 and 10300 of 2020 S.Jegatheesan, ... Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2. The District Collecotr, Thoothukudi District Thoothukudi. 3. The District Collector, Kanyakumari District Nagerkovil. 4. The Sub-Collector, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District. 5. The Sub Collector,, 6. The District Revenue Officer, Tirunelveli. 7. The District Revenue Officer, Thoothukudi. 8. The District Revenue Officer, Nagerkoil, Kanyakumari District. 9. The Revenue Divisional Offic, Er, Tiruchendur, Thoothukudi District. 10. The Revenue Divisional Offic, Er, Srivaikuntam, Thoothukudi District. 11. The Revenue Divisional Offic, Er, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District. 12. The Revenue Divisional Offic, Er, Nagarkoilkanyakumari District. 13. The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Thisayanvilai, Tirunelveli District. 14. The Tahsildar, Officethisayanvilai Tirunelveli District. 15. The Tahsildar,, Office of Tahsildar, Eral, Thoothukudi District. 16. The Tahsildar,, Office of Tahsildar, Ettayapuram, 17. The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar Ettayapuram 18. The Tahsildar,, Office of Tahsildar, Ottapidaram, 19. The Tahsildar,, Office of Tahsildar, Srivaikuntam, 20. The Tahsildar,, Office of Tahsildar, Tirchendur, 21. The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Thoothukudi, 22. The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar Vilathikulam 23. The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Kalkulam Kanyakumari District. 24. The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Kalkulam Kanyakumari District. 25. The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Killiyur Kanyakumari District. 26. S.Vaikuntharajan, S/o.Late.A.S.V.Subbiah Nadar, M.L Their Road, Keeraikaranthattu, Tisaiyanvilai Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 25 herein not to act or entertain application for Patta Transfer or any other application for mutation of revenue records submitted or to be submitted by the 26threspondent herein his family members or anyone claiming under him with respect to the immovable properties being lands and buildings described in Schedule C of alleged Kaithadi Partition Deed dt.31.12.2018 and Conciliation Report dt.02.01.2019 either belonged to the Partnership Firms in which boththe Petitioner 26th respondent and their family members are Partners or in the joint names of the Petitioner herein the 26th respondent and their family members and not to pass any orders/proceedings thereon, pending final adjudication of the question of law and various legal issues involved in CRP (MD) No.1797 to 1799 / 2019 on the file of this Court. For Petitioner :Mr.R.Thiyagarajan Senior counsel for M/s.V.P.Sengottuvel, For Respondents :Mr.R.Ragavendran for R1 to R25 Additional Government Pleader Mr.V.Ragavachari for Mr.J.kingsly Solomon for R26

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.