VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S.Petchimuthu v. The Inspector General of Registration

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
14 December 2023
Bench
N. Anand Venkateshauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 12244/2020

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order dated 23.07.2020 passed by the third respondent and for a further direction to the third respondent to correct the guideline value of the subject property.

¶2When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate produced the written instructions received from the District Registrar, Tirunelveli District. The relevant portion is extracted hereunder: bghUs; bjhlu;ghf ghu;it 1-y; fz;l fojj;jpy; "

Fwpg;gpl;Ls;s

jpUbey;ntyp

gjpt[

khtl;lk;>

vz;

,izrhu;gjpthsu;

mYtyfj;jpw;Fl;gl;l rj;jpuk;g[Jf;Fsk; fpuhkk; ru;nt vz;> 401/2> 402/1> 402/2f;Fl;gl;l Vf;fu; 1 brz;L 90 bghWj;J ghu;it 2y; fz;l

tl;lhl;rpau;

mYtyf

o.u;.vz;. 2021/0153/29/001587TR vd;w nfhg;gpd; go mUs;kpF rpj;jptpehafu; nfhtpy; fhyre;jp fl;lis vd;w bgaupy; ,Ue;j gl;lh rhj;jhf;Fl;o kfd; ngr;rpKj;J vd;w bgaupy; gl;lh khWjy; bra;J Mizaplg;gl;Ls;sJ> nkw;go ghu;it 2y; fz;l Mizapd; mog;gilapy; ghu;it 3y; fhZk; jpUbey;ntyp> khtl;lg;gjpthsu; (epUthfk;) mtu;fshy; nkw;go g[y vz;fSf;F b+f;nlh; 1f;F U:.2482500/-vd;W kjpg;g[ epu;zak; bra;ag;gl;L 17.03.2022 md;W Mizaplg;gl;Ls;sJ. nkw;go Mizapd; mog;gilapy;

04.04.2022 md;W Mtz vz;>530/2022-Mf jpUbey;ntyp 1vz; ,izrhu;gjpthsu; mYtyfj;jpy; kDjhuh; jpU.ngr;rpKj;J vd;gtuhy; jpUkjp.jhaks;shs; vd;gtUf;F Vw;ghL Mtzk; vGjp gjpt[bra;ag;gl;Ls;sJ vd;gij bjuptpj;Jf;bfhs;fpnwd;."

¶3It is clear from the above that the document has already been registered as Document No.530 of 2022 on 04.04.2022.

¶4Recording the above, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

14.12.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no Nsr To

1.The Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, Chennai.

2.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department,

3.The District Registrar, Tirunelveli District,

4.The Sub Registrar, Office of the Joint I Sub Registrar,

5.The Tahsildar, Tirunelveli Taluk,

6.The Commissioner, The Tirunelveli City Municipal Corporation,

7.The Assistant Commissioner, Thachanallur Zone, The Tirunelveli City Municipal Corporation,

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. Nsr

14.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and W.M.P.(MD).No.12531 of 2020 S.Petchimuthu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, Chennai. 2.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, 3.The District Registrar, Tirunelveli District, 4.The Sub Registrar, Office of the Joint I Sub Registrar, 5.The Tahsildar, Tirunelveli Taluk, 6.The Commissioner, The Tirunelveli City Municipal Corporation, 7.The Assistant Commissioner, Thachanallur Zone, The Tirunelveli City Municipal Corporation, ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 23.07.2020 passed by the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.29/A2/2020 and quash the same and further direct the third respondent to correct the guideline value of the lands in Survey Nos.401/2, 402/2, 402/1 admeasuring 1 Acre 90 Cents situated at Chatram Pudukulam Village, Tirunelveli by removing the Shri Siddhi Vinayagar Temple's name and include the petitioner's name in the said lands. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Selvan For Respondents : Mr.R.Ragavendran Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.