VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

K.Palanichamy v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 April 2026
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
WP Crl.(MD) 2042/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S Justice L.Victoria Gowri

Judgment

ORDER This petition has been filed challenging the rejection order in Na.Ka.No. 50/Ka.Thu.Ka./Periyakulam/2026 dated 02.04.2026 passed by the 1st respondent, as far as the denial of permission for conducing Nadagam, Pattimandram, Voyilattam, Karakattam and cultural program Nattiyam with songs on 14.04.2026 at about 06.00 p.m., in the eve of Palkuda celebration for Arulmigu Sri Kailasanathar Temple, Kailasapatti, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District and consequently direct the respondents to give a permission for conducting the cultural program on 14.04.2026 at 6.00 p.m., in the eve of Palkuda celebration for Arulmigu Sri Kailasanathar Temple, Kailasapatti, based on the petitioner's representation dated 01.04.2026.

¶2It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu issued two circulars bearing Rc.No.159539/Crime. 4(3)/2018, signed on 31.10.2018 and Rc.007301/GenlI(1)/2019, dated

09.04.2019, wherein instructions have been given to the Inspectors of Police throughout Tamil Nadu for consideration of applications seeking permission for conducting cultural programme.

¶3In view of the above, the impugned order dated 02.04.2026 is hereby quashed. This Writ Petition is allowed on the following conditions:-

(a) The petitioner is permitted to conduct Nadagam, Pattimandram, Voyilattam, Karakattam and cultural program on 14.04.2026 from 07.00 p.m., to 10.00 p.m., in the eve of Palkuda celebration for Arulmigu Sri Kailasanathar Temple, Kailasapatti, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District.

(b) The organisers, who shall be the responsible members of the festival committee, shall ensure that only cultural programs having some relevance to the temple or the festival in question would be conducted and there shall not be any obscene display/dance being conducted;

(c) The program shall not extend beyond 10 p.m.;

(d) No women participating in the cultural program would be depicted or portrayed in an obscene or undignified manner either in the form of clothing or otherwise;

(e) The music that shall be used shall be in sync with the precincts of the temple and double meaning songs should not be played;

(f) There shall be no supply of alcohol or any intoxicating material in and around the area where cultural program is scheduled to be held;

(g) None of the songs or dances performed in the said programme shall exhibit any political tone, tenor, or colour, nor shall they relate to or promote any religion, community, or caste.

(h) Organizers shall not erect any digital banners/placards on either side of the arterial roads, platforms, walkways/major roads and any other roads;

(i) the function should not affect caste, religious or communal harmony and shall be conducted without any discrimination;

(j) The attire of the dancers performing in the said programme should be modest and does not involve exposure of the midriff, thighs, legs or chest. Any violation of this condition shall result in legal action, including the arrest of the organisers and all members of the temple committee.

(k) the Police is empowered to stop the programme, if it exceeds beyond the permitted time;

(l) if any untoward incident takes place, the organizers of the programme be made responsible for the same;

(m) the organizers shall have to obtain all other required permission from the authorities concerned;

(n) Any other conditions as the authority concerned consider to impose according to the ground reality. In case of violation of any conditions, it is open to the authorities to initiate such action as is required under law and the persons who are the organisers/committee members shall be held responsible.

10.04.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No sm Note: Issue order copy on 10.04.2026. TO:-

¶1The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Deputy Superintendent of Police Office, Periyakulam, Theni District.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Thenkarai Police Station, Periyakulam, Theni District.

¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. Sm Dated

10.04.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.04.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI K.Palanichamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Deputy Superintendent of Police Office, Periyakulam, Theni District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Thenkarai Police Station, Periyakulam, Theni District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings in Na.Ka.No.50/Ka.Thu.Ka./Periyakulam/2026 dated 02.04.2026 passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal as far as the denial of permission for conducing Nadagam, Pattimandram, Voyilattam, Karakattam and cultural program Nattiyam with songs on 14.04.2026 at about 06.00 p.m., in the eve of Palkuda celebration for Arulmigu Sri Kailasanathar Temple, Kailasapatti, Periyakulam Taluk, Theni District and consequently direct the respondents to give a permission for conducting the cultural program on 14.04.2026 at 6.00 p.m., in the eve of Palkuda celebration for Arulmigu Sri Kailasanathar Temple, Kailasapatti, based on the petitioner's representation dated 01.04.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Muruganantham For Respondents : Mr.S.Ravi Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.