VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Senthil Kumar.T v. The Home Secretary

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 August 2023
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 12202/2021

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed for Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the impugned order, dated 09.02.2021. Through the impugned order, the respondents have declined permission to cut Teak wood trees.

¶2The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that pending writ petition, the petitioner had cut all the trees and First Information Report was also registered on

11.10.2021 in H.P.No.2021. The statement is recorded.

¶3Recording the aforesaid statement, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. Index : Yes / No

07.08.2023 Internet : Yes NCC : Yes / No ksa To

¶1The Home Secretary, Home Department, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

¶2The Principal secretary to Government, Department of Environment and Forest, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

¶3The District Collector & Chairman, Theni Tree Cutting Regulation Committee,

¶4The Wildlife Warden, Office of the Megamalai Wildlife Division,

¶5The Executive Engineer, Agricultural Engineering Department,

S.SRIMATHY, J ksa

07.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY T.Senthilkumar ... Petitioner vs. 1. The Home Secretary, Home Department, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2. The Principal secretary to Government, Department of Environment and Forest, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 3. The District Collector & Chairman, Theni Tree Cutting Regulation Committee, 4. The Wildlife Warden, Office of the Megamalai Wildlife Division, 5. The Executive Engineer, Agricultural Engineering Department, ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records, relating to the impugned proceedings in Na.Ka.No 17802/2020/G7, dated 09.02.2021 and quash same as illegal, consequently direct the first respondent to consider the Appeal filed by the writ petitioner for cutting down 230 Teak Tree situated in Patta Agriculture land in survey no 1873,1A1B3, 1873,1A1B6, 1873,1A1B7, 1873,1A1B9, 1873,1A1B10, 1873,1A1B14 situated at Mela Koodalur south village, Oothamapalaiyam Taluk, Theni District. For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah For Respondents : Mr.M.Ramesh, Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.