R.Gunasekaran, v. The State of Tamilnadu,

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer in this petition has become infructuous.

2.In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as Infructuous. No costs.

07.07.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No sji To

1.The Principal Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Public Works Department, Chennai-9.

2.The Engineer in Chief (General), Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai-6005. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

,J.

sji DATED : 07.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY R.Gunasekaran ... Petitioner vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Chennai-9. 2.The Engineer in Chief (General), Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai-6005. 3.The Principal Accountant General (Accounts & Entitlement) 361, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 013. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent's to Fix Notional Monetary Benefits and Service Benefits of the 749 NMR's with effect from the date of completion of 10 years of service, and subsequently consider the petitioner representation, dated 22.03.2019, sent on 03.05.2019 within stipulated time, by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.S.Durai Pandian For R1 & R2 : Mr.J.John Rajadurai Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.P.Gunasekaran