- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 1 June 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 10789/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the writ petitioner and the learned standing counsel for TANGEDCO.
2.The respondent is directed to pass order on the petition mentioned representation on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. It is open to the respondent to pass order one way or the order.
3.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
01.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
01.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN D.Saravanan ... Petitioner Vs. The Chief Engineer (Personnel), TANGEDCO, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to take necessary action regarding the petitioner's representation dated on 09.01.2023 judiciously and drop further action on the charge memo based on the judicial decision and re-instate the petitioner service forthwith as ordered by the High Court. For Petitioner : Ms.V.Jeyarani For Respondent : Mrs.M.Parameswari, Standing Counsel.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.