Karthick v. The Superintendent of Police

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondents 2 and 3 not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry on the complaint of the 4th respondent.

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the fourth respondent herein, enquiry was undertaken. During the course of enquiry, both parties have appeared and given undertakings. Based upon the above said undertakings, the above said enquiry was closed.

3.In view of the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), this criminal original petition is dismissed as infructuous.

28.04.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : TM To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

2.The Assistant Superintendent of Police, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Karaikudi North Police Station, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN

,J.

TM

28.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.04.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Karthick ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2.The Assistant Superintendent of Police, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Karaikudi North Police Station, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. 4.Uma ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry on the complaint of the 4th respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar for R1 to 3 Government Advocate (Crl. Side)