- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 April 2023
- Bench
- R. Subramanian, S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 10488/2023
Judgment
O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] The petitioner seeks partial discharge of the mortgage. We do not think that such a relief could be granted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. No costs.
[R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.]
28.04.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :
krk R.SUBRAMANIAN , J . and L.VICTORIA GOWRI , J . krk
28.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI N.Karpaga Narayanan ... Petitioner -vs- The Authorised Officer Canara Bank West Avani Moola Street Madurai-625 001 ... Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to remove the dwelling house property which had been shown as first scheduled property in possession notice dated 28.11.2022 and to return the house document bearing document No.3825 of 2000, situated at Door No.217, Plot No.35, S.No.79/4 and 79/1, Ward No.24, EB Colony, Iyer Bungalow, Thiruppalai Village, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai District, along with other mother documents. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Senthil Kumar For Respondent : Mr.C.Deepak
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.