VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Seema v. The Regional Passport Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
4 May 2023
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 11236/2023

Judgment

O R D E R This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to issue passport to the petitioner, by considering the Application in No.MD1075216659923 dated 28.03.2023 within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶2The case of the petitioner is that she is working an Agency Development Manager, HDFC Life Insurance, Madurai Branch. Since her passport is about to expire on 20.10.2023, she applied for renewal of her passport on 28.03.2023 with an application No. MD1075216659923. The first respondent sent a communication stating that an adverse police verification report was received that she is involved in a case in Crime No.167 of 2021 on the file of the 2nd respondent and requesting her to send her explanation in this regard within a period of 30 days. She has also sent her reply to the first respondent on 22.04.2023 that due to family dispute, a false complaint has been given against her, based on which, the said case has been registered. Despite the same, her passport application has not been considered. Hence, she filed the present writ petition.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that due to family dispute, a false complaint has been given against her, based on which, the said case has been registered. He would further submit that it is a settled position of law that the mere pendency of FIR is not a bar for the authority to issue passport to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent would submit that the first respondent will consider the explanation given by the petitioner and take a decision in accordance with law.

¶5As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is a settled position of law that the mere pendency of FIR is not a bar for the authority to issue passport. Therefore, the first respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's passport application and take an appropriate decision on it in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

04.05.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No CM/ogy To

¶1The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Racecourse Road, Madurai – 2.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Melavalavu Police Station, Madurai District. M.DHANDAPANI,J. CM/ogy

04.05.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.05.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Seema ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Racecourse Road, Madurai – 2. 2. The Inspector of Police, Melavalavu Police Station, Madurai District. ... Respondents Prayer:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to issue the passport to the petitioner considering the Application in No.MD1075216659923 dated 28.03.2023 within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Poornachandran For R1 : Mr.M.Karthikeya Venkatesan For R2 : Mr.D.Gandhiraj, Special Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.