- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 July 2023
- Bench
- S Justice S.Srimathy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 12310/2021
Judgment
ORDER The writ petitioner has instructed his counsel to withdraw this Writ Petition. Accordingly, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and has circulated a letter in this connection.
¶2Hence, permission is granted and accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
28.07.2023
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Nsr To
1.The Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Director of School Education, D.P.I.Complex, Chennai.
3.The District Educational Officer, Office of the District Educational Office, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur.
4.The Chief Educational Officer, Office of the Chief Educational Office, Kumbakonam,
S.SRIMATHY, J.
Nsr
28.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and W.M.P.(MD).No.9667 of 2021 Balia Muslim Sangam, Represented by its Secretary, M.A.Hajamohideen ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Director of School Education, D.P.I.Complex, Chennai. 3.The District Educational Officer, Office of the District Educational Office, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur. 4.The Chief Educational Officer, Office of the Chief Educational Office, Kumbakonam, 5.K.E.P.Mohammed Ali, President, Balia Muslim Sangam, Valuthur, ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 1 to 4 from in any manner granting any approval or permission for appointment of teaching / non teaching staff in S.I.B.M.S. School situated at Valuthur, Papanasam Taluk, Thanjavur District on the basis of any proposal sent by the 5th respondent in his capacity as a Correspondent on the basis of communication issued by the 4th respondent vide Na.Ka.No. 3529/A4/2020 dated 08.09.2020. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Jameel Arasu For R-1 to R-4 : Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugam, Government Advocate. For R-5 : Mr.A.Senthil Kumar
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.