VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

The Retired Labour Association of Aavin Trichy v. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by Its Principal Secretary to Government

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
15 April 2026
Bench
Mummineni Sudheer Kumarauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 10332/2026

Judgment

O R D E R W.M.P. (MD) No. 8126 of 2026, filed by the petitioner seeking permission of this Court to file a single Writ Petition, is ordered. Page No. 2 of 6

¶2The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to implement the benefit of One-Man Commission as stipulated under the Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.338, Finance (Pay Cell) Department dated

26.08.2010 issued by the Government of Tamil Nadu and by considering representation dated 23.03.2026 submitted by the petitioners.

¶3This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the admission stage itself for the reasons set out in the succeeding paragraphs.

¶4In all, there are two petitioners in the present Writ Petition. Upon perusal of the materials on record, there is nothing to show that any representation was submitted by the second petitioner. Even the so-called representation submitted by the first petitioner is dated 19.03.2026, but signed on 31.03.2026. The said representation is stated to have been sent by registered post on 23.03.2026 to the respondents. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the same was delivered on 27.03.2026.

¶5The petitioners could not even wait for a reasonable period for the respondents to act upon the said representation and have approached Page No. 3 of 6 this Court by filing the present Writ Petition. In view of the fact that the petitioners have rushed to this Court within a week from the date of the alleged submission of the representation, this Court is not inclined to entertain the Writ Petition.

¶6It is also to be noted that the first petitioner is an Association, which is stated to be the signatory to the said representation. There is no representation from the second petitioner, nor there is any averment in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition with regard to his service particulars or any representation submitted by him.

¶7In the light of the above, this Court is not inclined to entertain this Writ Petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the remaining Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

15.04.2026 JEN NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Page No. 4 of 6 To The Principal Secretary Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, The State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai. Page No. 5 of 6

MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J. JEN

15.04.2026 Page No. 6 of 6

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.04.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.8126 & 8127 of 2026 1.The Retired Labour Association of Aavin Trichy, Represented by its Secretary, V.Elakkumanakumar, No.60A, East Kondaiyampettai, Thiruvanaikovil, Srirangam Taluk, Trichy - 5. 2.R.Arockiyasamy ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu , Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying, Fisheries, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Commissioner, The Department of Milk Production and Dairy Development, Madhavaram Milk Colony, Madhavaram, Chennai - 51. 3.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Co-operative Milk Page No. 1 of 6 Producer Federation Limited, Avin Illam, Nandanam, Chennai - 35. 4.The General Manager, Trichy District Cooperative Milk Producers Union Limited, Pudukkottai Road, Kottapattu, Trichy - 23. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to implement the benefit of One-Man Commission as stipulated under the Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.338, Finance (Pay Cell) Department dated 26.08.2010 issued by the Government of Tamil Nadu and by considering the petitioners' representation dated 23.03.2026 within the stipulated period fixed by this Court. For Petitioners : Mr.A.Mohammed Aqil for M/s.Ajmal Associates For R1 : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader For R2 to R4 : Mr.R.Ganesh Prabhu *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.