- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 April 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 10532/2023
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
2.This order is passed based on the consent given by the writ petitioner through his counsel and the management given through the standing counsel.
3.The petitioner is presently working as Conductor in the respondent corporation. He has been visited with an order of transfer as well as charge memo. The learned counsel for the petitioner strongly contended that since the transfer order partakes of punitive colour, it has to be interfered with. After considering the entire materials on record, I indicated to the management that they can either proceed with the order of transfer and withdraw charge memo or they can proceed with charge memo and not press the transfer order and that they cannot do both.
4.The matter was passed over to enable the learned standing counsel to get instructions. When the matter was finally taken up, the learned standing counsel submitted that they will withdraw the charge memo. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will accept the order of transfer and report for duty in the transferred place on 05.05.2023. I make it clear that the concession given by the management will be applicable only to the petitioner alone.
5.Recording the consent of the petitioner to abide by the order of transfer, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
28.04.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
28.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)No.9355 of 2023 Damodarajan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The General Manager, TNSTC (Madurai) Ltd., Virudhunagar Zone, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Assistant Manager (Administration), TNSTC (Madurai) Ltd., Virudhunagar Zone, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Branch Manager, TNSTC, Virudhunagar Branch, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the 1st respondent impugned proceedings in Tha.A.Po.Ka/Virudhu/Nir/A2/316/2022 dated 27.03.2023 and 3rd respondent consequential communication in Tha.A.Po.Ka/Virudhu/Pani Seramaippu/24/2023 dated 20.04.2023 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.Anantha Murugan For Respondents : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh, Standing Counsel.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.