VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

R.Jeya Retna Shebha, v. The State of Tamilnadu,

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
5 September 2023
Bench
D.Bharatha Chakravarthyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 2045/2019

Judgment

O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner represents that the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous.

¶2Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

05.09.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet :Yes / No sji To

1.The Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai-600 005.

3.The Chief Educational Officer, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil-629 001.

4.The District Educational Officer, Nagercoil-629 001, D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

, J.

sji

05.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P.(MD)No.1654 of 2019 R.Jeya Retna Shebha ... Petitioner vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai-600 005. 3.The Chief Educational Officer, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil-629 001. 4.The District Educational Officer, Nagercoil-629 001, 5.The Corporate Manager, CSI Corporate Schools, CSI Diocese of Kanyakumari No.71 A, Dennis Street, Nagercoil-629 001. 6.The Correspondent, Ringle Taube Higher Secondary School, Mylaudy-629 403, ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to approve forthwith the appointment of the petitioner as PG Assistant in Chemistry in the sixth respondent school namely, Ringle Taube Higher Secondary School, Mylaudy, Kanyakumari District w.e.f., 01.06.2016 and disburse grant-in-aid towards her salary and all other attendant benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Xavier Rajini For Respondents : Mr.J.John Rajadurai Government Advocate for R1 to R4 No Appearance for R5 & R6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.