VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Nagarajan v. The Inspector of Police

ORDERED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 April 2023
Bench
G.K. Ilanthiraiyanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 8247/2023

Judgment

CRL OP(MD)No.8247 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 28.04.2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD)No.8247 of 2023 Nagarajan ... Petitioner/sole accused

Vs State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Ponnamaravathi Police Station, Pudukkkottai District. (Crime No.71 of 2023) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sivabalan,Advocate For Respondent : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi

Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :-For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.71 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

The petitioner/sole accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420 of IPC and Section 15(3)of Indian Medical Council Act, in Crime No.71 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is the Village Administrative Officer of Ammankurichi Taluk. On

19.04.2023 at about 02.00 pm., the defacto complainant along with Village Assistant went to Nagarapatti for field inspection. When getting phone call, the defacto complainant went to nearby Pillaiyarkovil street of Nagarapatti and then, he found the petitioner, who sat in the chair with stethoscope. The defacto complainant asked about the proof of his medical education and the petitioner said that there is no proof. Thereafter, it was found that the petitioner was practicing medicine illegally without any CRL OP(MD)No.8247 of 2023 medical education and training and also in the shop various medical items are found and the same was seized by the defacto complainant, but the petitioner escaped from the scene of occurrence. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. The Medical Shop namely Sree Saibaba Medical is running by one N.Ramalingam and P.Dineshkumar is the in-charge of said medical shop.

¶4Heard and perused the materials available on records including the First Information Report.

¶5Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶6Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ponnamaravathi, Pudukkottai District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police daily morning at 10.30 am., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. CRLeOP(MD)No.8247eofe2023 [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC. sd/- 28/04/2023 / TRUE COPY / /05/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. RMK TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PONNAMARAVATHI, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. 2 DO THROUGH: THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PONNAMARAVATHI POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/s.SIVABALAN.K, Advocate ( SR-7099[I] dated 28/04/2023 ) ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.8247 of 2023 Date :28/04/2023 PKP/VR/SAR-4/17.05.2023/ 3P/6C

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.