VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

V.Murugeshwari v. The Superintendent of Police

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 November 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 10719/2022

Judgment

ORDER This petition has been filed to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner without any legally sustainable complaint and to direct the respondents to follow the guideline issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in D.K. Basu (1997 1 SCC 416) case.

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that based on the complaint given by the third respondent enquiry was undertaken, during the course of enquiry, it is seen that there is a landlord and tenant issue between the parties and they were advised to work out their remedies before the appropriate Civil Court. Hence, the said complaint was closed.

3.In view of the civil dispute between the parties, nothing survives for further adjudication. This Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

21.11.2023 NCC: Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes/ No PNM To

¶1The Superintendent of Police, O/o the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Pattiveeranpatti Police Station, Pattiveeranpatti, Dindigul.

¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

G.ILANGOVAN, J. PNM ORDER IN

21.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN V.Murugeshwari ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Pattiveeranpatti Police Station, Pattiveeranpatti, Dindigul. 3. V. Kavitha ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying this Court to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner without any legally sustainable complaint and to direct the respondents to follow the guideline issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in D.K. Basu (1997 1 SCC 416) case. For Petitioner : Mr. Prithviraj C For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar (R1, R2) Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.