VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Senthil Kumar v. The Inspector of Police

ORDERED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 April 2023
Bench
G.K. Ilanthiraiyanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 8240/2023

Judgment

CRL OP(MD)No.8240 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 28.04.2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD)No.8240 of 2023 Senthil Kumar ... Petitioner/Accused 6

Vs State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Ammayanaickanur Police Station, Dindigul District. (Crime No.46 of 2023)

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.K.Arunraj, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.46 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/rank not known, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, 469 and 471 of IPC in Crime No.46 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant lodged a complaint before the respondent police stating that the petitioner along with other accused received a sum of Rs.8,60,000/- from him in order to get job and thereafter cheated him. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is only Auto driver. Even according to the case of the prosecution, the petitioner received a sum of Rs.80,000/- from the defacto complainant. Now, the petitioner is ready and willing to deposit the said amount.

¶4Heard and perused the materials available on records including the First Information Report.

¶5Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the amount, this CRL OP(MD)No.8240 of 2023 Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is ordered on condition that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.80,000/-(Rupees Eighty Thousand only) to the credit of Cr.No.46 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police.

¶6On such deposit being made, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police daily morning at 10.30 am., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC. sd/- 28/04/2023 / TRUE COPY / /05/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. CRLeOP(MD)No.8240eofe2023 RMK TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKOTTAI. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMMAYANAICKANUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.K.ARUNRAJ Advocate SR.No.7121 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.8240 of 2023 Date :28/04/2023 SA/VR/SAR.3/17.05.2023/3P/6C

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.