VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S.Sellappan v. The Superintendent of Police

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
25 August 2023
Bench
D.Nagarjunauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 13464/2023

Judgment

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13464oofo2023o BEFOREoTHEoMADURAIoBENCHoOFoMADRASoHIGHoCOURT DATED:o25.08.2023 CORAM: THEoHONOURABLEoDR.JUSTICEoD.NAGARJUN Crl.O.P.(MD)oNo.13464oofo2023

1.S.Sellappan

2.S.Samvinoth

3.J.Selvi

4.R.Usha

5.S.Murugaiah

6.P.Mohan

7.R.Poomani

8.N.Chandrasekaran

9.N.Rajasekar

10.R.Chandra

11.R.Hariharan

12.R.Rajashree

13.V.Arundhadhi

14.V.Elanthamilan

15.S.Manickam

16.P.Durairaj

17.D.Deepa

18.K.Kalaiselvan

19.S.Jothimurugan

20.J.Sendhilkumar

21.M.Sankar

22.S.Satheeshkumar

23.P.Mahalingam

24.D.Balakrishnan

25.P.Manikandan

26.C.Jeyakumar

27.T.Raja

28.S.Manikandan

29.S.Gowri

30.C.Saravanan

31.K.Arumugam

32.K.Lakshmi

33.S.Karthiga Devi

34.M.Radhakrishnan

35.K.Murugeswari

36.R.Jeyanthi

37.K.Dhanalakshmi

38.E.Vennila

39.V.Thangammal

40.D.Rajeswari

41.A.Pidari

42.K.Valli

43.P.Vasantha

44.P.Sumathi

45.S.Kala

46.G.Gunasekaran

47.A.Appuroja

48.S.Kalaiselvi

49.M.Vijayakanth

50.Pandiyammal

51.B.Vaithaki Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13464oofo2023o

52.G.Pappathi

53.R.Ramkumar

54.C.Rajendran

55.S.Tamilarasi

56.S.Santhi

57.R.Muthulakshmi

58.M.Alagusundhari

59.S.Rabika

60.K.Bharathi

61.K.Uma

62.S.Aburoja

63.V.Ganesan

64.I.Kadharbeevi

65.I.Samsudeen

66.I.Hadeeja

67.D.Karthick

68.D.Poomayil

69.S.Amsavalli

70.C.Nithya

71.G.Pandiyammal

72.R.Arputharaja

73.C.Dharmaraj

74.V.Veerammal

75.V.Ramachandraboopathy

76.V.Chellammal

77.V.Narasimman

78.A.Deepa

79.M.Vijayalakshmi

80.P.Rajalakshmi

81.C.Sivagami

82.T.Sumathi

83.M.Vennila

84.M.Marimuthu

85.K.Alagarsamy

86.M.Fathima Rose

87.S.Moorthi

88.B.D.Doddahuchaiah

89.B.N.Varalakshmi

90.D.Shivamma

91.N.Vinaykumar

92.B.Saritha

93.R.Duraikannu

94.D.Saraswathi

95.S.Santha

96.G.Rajakannu

97.A.Murugan

98.A.Chinnaiyah ... Petitioners Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Special Officer, ELPHIN Cheating, EOW, Ashok Pillar, Chennai. ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the respondent to include the petitioners as witnesses in any one of the FIRs already registered against the accused and to include them as victims and the respondent may further be directed to take the complaints of the petitioners, registering the nature of the complaint by getting 161 statements from them. For Petitioner : Mr.B.A.Muruganantham For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Madhavan Government Advocate (crl.side)

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking for a direction to the respondents Police to examine the petitioners under Section 161 Cr.P.C in respect of a complaint given against Elfin Company.

¶2It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the petitioners and many other investors have invested huge amount in the said Company and all of them were cheated. On the complaint given by the investors, number of cases were registered. The grievance of the petitioners is that the Special Officer headed by the Superintendent of Police has not recorded the statements of the petitioners in any case and no FIR is registered basing on the complaint given by the petitioners.

¶3The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent Police submits that as per the directions issued by this Court on 27.07.2023, out of 98 witnesses, the statements of 91 witnesses have been recorded and the documents have been received and that the statements of rest of the witnesses will be recorded.

¶4Since the purpose for which the present petition has been filed has already been defeated, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. Index : Yes/No

25.08.2023 Internet : Yes/No ssb To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Special Officer, ELPHIN Cheating, EOW, Ashok Pillar, Chennai.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. DR.D.NAGARJUN. J.

ssb

25.08.2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.